Legal Opinion
Qi v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 20, 2010No. Civil Action 10-0190 (RBW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiffs complaint alleges that the defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (‘WaMu”), improperly breached a lease agreement and seeks relief for damages arising from the FDIC-receiver’s repudiation of the lease. Currently before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (“Def.’s Mot.”). 1 For the reasons explained below, the defendant’s motion is granted.
I. Factual Background
On May 30, 2006, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Longwood Village Restaurant, Ltd. v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Doe v. De Amigos, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Boster v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- MCI Communications Services, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.