Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Lee Bast and Redex Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 22, 1974No. 72-2132PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Bast and Redex Corporation were indicted for, inter alia, possessing, distributing and advertising devices for the interception of wire and oral communications, in violation of a provision of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2512 (1970). Electronic recording and listening devices, as well as advertising and records of distribution and sale, were seized at the corporate offices of the defendant Redex Corporation pursuant to a search warrant, issued on an affidavit alleging violations of § 2512. The defendants filed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- William Von Sleichter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Cooper v. NewtonU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. WynnDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1986
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.