Legal Opinion
Dubilier Condenser Corporation v. Radio Corporation of America
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 12, 1929No. 663-665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
These three suits, each based upon a patent having to do with the radio art and now upon final hearing, were tried together. In each, Radio Corporation of America is defendant. In two, the plaintiffs are Dubilier Condenser Corporation, Percival D. Lowell, and Francis-W. Dun-more. In the third, they are the same, save that Lowell is not included. The patents sued upon are No. 1,455,141 to Lowell and Dun-more, No. 1,606,212 to Dunmore and Lowell, and No. 1,635,117 to Dunmore. The corporate plaintiff is the exclusive licensee under each. The claims in issue are 3 and 14 of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lowell v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Berghane v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Berghane v. Radio Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931
- Lowell v. TriplettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937