Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Triplett

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 13, 1937No. 2193Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The present suit is for alleged infringement of three patents which, broadly classified, may be described as relating to radio receiving apparatus. Plaintiffs, consisting of the two patentees, Messrs. Lowell and Dunmore, and their licensee, the Dubilier Condenser Corporation, contend that all of these patents are infringed by the apparatus sold by defendants, consisting of a partnership, the Baltimore Gas Light Company, and the four individuals composing it. Defendants deny infringement, and also assert invalidity of plaintiffs’ patents.

The three patents are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API