Legal Opinion

Hastert v. State Board of Elections

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 6, 1991No. 91 C 4028, 91 C 4154, 91 C 4643, 91 C 4656 and 91 C 5472PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before KANNE, Circuit Judge, NORGLE, District Judge, and CONLON, District Judge. CONLON, District Judge.

In these consolidated cases, the court is called upon to select a congressional redistricting plan for the State of Illinois. Following the tabulation of the 1990 decennial census, the Office of the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives informed the Governor of Illinois that Illinois is now entitled to only twenty representatives due to population changes reflected in the 1990 census. Illinois currently has twenty-two representatives. The Illinois…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Larios v. CoxDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  3. James R. King v. Illinois State Board of Elections, David E. Murray, Lawrence E. Johnson v. Bobby Rush, Timuel Black, Al Johnson, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. DeGrandy v. WetherellDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1992
  5. Burton Ex Rel. Republican Party v. SheheenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API