Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Englund v. Los Angeles County
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 12, 2006No. CIV S-04-0282 LKK JFMPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOULDS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs March 22, 2006 motions to compel discovery came on regularly for hearing May 4, 2006. Jenny Teaford and Wendy Motooka appeared for plaintiff. Erik Swan-holt and Billie Hausburg appeared for defendant.
At the outset of the hearing on these motions counsel for plaintiff claimed that defendant was not participating in the conference required by Local Rule 37-251 in good faith in an attempt to narrow and describe their *679differences. Briefly stated the complaint was that the conference appeared to result in substantial agreement only to lead to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kevin F. Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, an Idaho Corporation, and Neil K. Farris, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Daiflon, Inc. v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Fund, Inc. v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mullins v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- (PC) Coleman v. VirgaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Drake v. MehtaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PS) Schmitz v. AsmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.