Legal Opinion
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 18, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAM ASMAN, et al., (ECF No. 338) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs move the court to determine the sufficiency of responses to discovery requests 18 served to defendants Andaluz, Asman, Brizendine, Ceballos, Diaz, Gibson, Ramkumar, Rudas, 19 M. Smith, and Toche. (ECF No. 338.) The parties’ briefs addressing this discovery dispute are 20 before the court. (ECF Nos. 338 (Motion), 345 (Opposition), 352 (Reply).)1 Pursuant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jesus Briones v. Riviera Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- United States v. Philip Morris IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.