Legal Opinion

Riffle v. Worthen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1997No. 95-1239PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellants, Wayne Riffle and Charles Mitchell, a/k/a M. R. Properties, a partnership, appeal the decree of the Pulaski County Chancery Court declaring that they were not entitled to an appurtenant easement or an easement of necessity over land adjoining their land and owned by Appellees, George C. Worthen, William B. Worthen, Mary Fletcher Worthen, Renee B. Fletcher individually and as executor of the estate of Thomas B. Fletcher, Evan M. Fletcher, Heidi F. Nichols, and John Does 1-10. The court of appeals certified this case to us as one involving the construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boullioun v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Craig v. O'BRYANSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
  4. Burdess v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  5. Kennedy v. PappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Anderson v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. King v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API