Legal Opinion

Fry v. Sheedy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1956No. Civ. 16734PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment pursuant to a jury verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries.

Appellant was injured on July 1, 1952, while employed by the San Jose Steel Company as a working foreman. At the time of the accident he and his crew were engaged in removing a fence at Hunter’s Point in San Francisco. This particular fence was made up of H-type steel fence posts, wire and fittings. The fittings and the wire were first removed by appellant and his helpers and it then became necessary to obtain a crane in order to remove the posts. Appellant contacted respondent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Roddiscraft, Inc. v. Skelton Logging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Estate of HormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Broden v. Marin Humane SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Valentine v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API