Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1961No. Civ. 19559PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

This is another appeal in which the principal ground urged is that the court gave a res ipsa loquitur instruction that took from the jury the question as to whether the essential elements upon which the applicability of the doctrine is predicated had been proved by the plaintiffs. Other errors in instructing the jury are also claimed. We have concluded that there was error, but that under the peculiar facts of the case the error was not so prejudicial as to require a reversal.

I. Res Ipsa Loquitur.

The action is for medical malpractice, and is based upon the fact that the minor plaintiff, who…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jistarri v. NappiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Vigil v. Miners Colfax Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Enis v. Specialty Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API