Legal Opinion

Ascherin v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The objections to the petition of the applicants for incorporation raise issues of fact which are for judicial determination. The result of the inquiry must depend upon the surroundings, occupations of the residents, the location of the territory, and the presence or absence of forces tending to develop and affect the prospects of the proposed village. From the evidence offered in support of and in opposition to the application the court is required to *651find whether or not those marks or signs fixed by the legislature, as indicating a condition of territory and habitation fit for incorporation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In re Incorporation of the Village of ChenequaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Zweifel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Zweifel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Coughran v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schatzman v. Town of GreenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re Village of Oconomowoc LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Buschman v. ZerfasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In Re Town of HallieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Town of Pleasant Prairie v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API