Legal Opinion

Buschman v. Zerfas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellants assign as error, (1) the refusal of the referee, upon the hearing before him to determine the sufficiency of the objecting petitions, to receive and consider the objecting petitions signed after the order of reference was made; and (2) that the evidence before the referee on the hearing upon the “whole issue” was insufficient to sustain his findings of fact upon that issue.(1) Sub. (1) of the statute, sec. 61.07, reads as follows:

“If prior to the date set for a hearing upon such application there is filed with the court a petition protesting against the incorporation of such.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. La Londe v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stevens v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Hawley v. County Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Application of ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Pascagoula v. SchefflerMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Tegt v. Circuit CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Village of Elmwood ParkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re Town of HallieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Village of Elmwood ParkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API