Legal Opinion

In Re Village of Oconomowoc Lake

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

We have only the question of the sufficiency of the petition to deal with. The court should not refuse to hold that the facts on which the purpose of the petition is based be fully presented so as to advise the objecting party of the essential elements claimed to exist and of the issues which must be met with relation to the existence or nonexistence of those essential elements. The preliminary proceedings, such as preparation of maps, survey, notice, and filing of petition were properly alleged and are not seriously challenged here. The sufficiency of the petition seeking the incorporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fenton v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Town of Brookfield v. BeisberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Village of Oconomowoc LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People Ex Rel. County of Du Page v. LoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re Village of Oconomowoc LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API