Legal Opinion

Zweifel v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed December 9, 1924:

OwEN, J.

It will be a sufficient statement of facts to say that this is an action in equity brought to test the validity of a certain ordinance adopted by the city council of the city of Milwaukee annexing certain territory to said city. The objections urged against the validity of the ordinance will appear as we proceed. The plaintiff is a taxpayer within the territory affected by the ordinance and brings this action in behalf of himself and all other resident electors and taxpayers within the annexed territory, under the authority of Lutien…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Langlade CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Lutien v. City of KewauneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cevene v. CeveneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of La Crosse v. RothwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Zweifel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Town of Lake v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ascherin v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API