Legal Opinion

Astuto v. V. Ray Gould Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1932No. 28286PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action brought under the workmen’s compensation law by Rosario Astuto, an employee of the V. Ray Gould Company, for an injury and subsequent disability sustained by him while working on the construction of the new Burlington, depot at Omaha, Nebraska, on or about January 30, 1930.

The facts in the case disclose that Rosario Astuto, appellee, is a 29-year-old mosaic worker, a married man with one child, and was employed during January,' 1930, by the V. Ray Gould Company as a common laborer on the new Burlington depot at Omaha, Nebraska, at 40 cents an hour for a nine-hour day. While…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. ParmelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Hastings v. SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Enterprise Planing Mill Co. v. Methodist Episcopal ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Welke v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Vukovich v. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lind v. Nebraska National GuardNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Williams v. DobbersteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Otis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API