Legal Opinion

Rolette County State's Attorney v. L.D.M.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] L.D.M. appeals from a trial court order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and continuing his civil commitment in the care, custody, and con*779trol of the executive director of the Department of Human Services. We reverse and remand because the trial court did not make sufficient findings to permit appellate review.

I

[¶2] In 2004, L.D.M. was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirmed the order of commitment in Interest of L.D.M., 2005 ND 177, 704 N.W.2d 838. In December 2008, L.D.M. filed a petition for discharge to review his status as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Suhr v. MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Interest of MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. O'Donnell v. L.D.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Stokes v. HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API