Rolette County State's Attorney v. L.D.M.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] L.D.M. appeals from a trial court order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and continuing his civil commitment in the care, custody, and con*779trol of the executive director of the Department of Human Services. We reverse and remand because the trial court did not make sufficient findings to permit appellate review.
I
[¶2] In 2004, L.D.M. was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirmed the order of commitment in Interest of L.D.M., 2005 ND 177, 704 N.W.2d 838. In December 2008, L.D.M. filed a petition for discharge to review his status as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Suhr v. MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Interest of MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- O'Donnell v. L.D.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. NakvindaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Stokes v. HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.