Suhr v. Maedche
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Thomas Maedche appeals a district court order involuntarily committing him as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues that North Dakota’s civil commitment statute is void for vagueness and that self-incrimination and due process guarantees preclude the use of his treatment-related disclosures in a civil commitment proceeding. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Maedche was convicted of indecent exposure after exposing himself and masturbating in front of a nine-year-old girl during a sleepover at a hotel. After the district court accepted Maedche’s guilty plea, he submitted to sex…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Pember v. ShapiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KordonowyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.