Legal Opinion
State v. Midgett
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 2010No. 20090253PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Christopher Midgett appeals an amended order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, claiming the district court erred in finding the State proved by clear and convincing evidence that he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In March 2007, Midgett was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual, and this Court affirmed the district court’s commitment order. Matter of Midgett, 2007 ND 198, ¶¶ 1, 14, 742 N.W.2d 803 (Midgett I). In February 2008, Midgett petitioned for discharge. Dr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Matter of MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Feland v. A.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re AmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.