Legal Opinion

Hynds Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby & Meador Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Wellborn. Lumpkin superior court. April term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Movants in a rule against the sheriff', to which the Oglesby & Meador Grocery Company had been made a party defendant, contested with the respondent company for the remainder of a fund raised by a sale of realty under a levy of executions of the movants founded on general judgments. The respondent company claimed under a mortgage of prior date to the judgments, and in its petition to be made a party defendant, alleged that at thé sale in question the entire estate in the land was' sold, and that the defendant in fi.fa. was wholly insolvent and had no other property besides…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker & Hall v. GladdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Tarver v. EllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Devaughn v. ByromSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hughes v. Mount Vernon BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Milner v. Pitts & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Kiser Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Oglesby & Meador v. Hynds Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API