Legal Opinion

Oglesby & Meador v. Hynds Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 25, 1895Published

Money rule. Before Judge Wellborn. Lumpkin superior court. April term, 1894.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

It affirmatively appearing that the plaintiffs in execution did not consent to a sale of the entire estate in the mortgaged property, that their counsel, before the sale, had informed counsel of the mortgagees that they would not so consent, and had also notified the crowd in attendance upon the sale that only the equity of redemption would be sold,, nothing passed at the sale except that equity, and the plaintiffs in execution are not estopped from so asserting, merely because counsel for the mortgagees announced at the sale that the entire property would be sold and that the purchaser would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hynds Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby & Meador Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API