Legal Opinion

Emporia Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1916No. 20,111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*137The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The public utilities act provides that whenever any utility desires to make a change in any rate it shall -file with the commission a schedule showing the change desired, and that no change shall be made without the consent of the commission (Laws 1911, ch. 238, § 20) ; and also that unless the commission shall otherwise order no utility shall collect a greater compensation than the charge fixed in the lowest schedule of rates for the same services on January 1, 1911 (§ 30). On the date named the Emporia Telephone Company had in force a rate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. Desser v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Wichita Water Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. City of Hutchinson v. Hutchinson Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. State v. Independence Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. SpillmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API