Hiner v. Olson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendants, with the exception of D. A. Olson, have appealed from a judgment of $3,000 which was rendered against them for injuries sustained by the' plaintiff as the result of negligence on the part of Olson while he was driving his automobile incident to his employment as traveling salesman for the drug firm of Morgan & Sampson.
The chief contentions are that the evidence fails to prove that Olson was the agent or servant of the appellants or that he was acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident.
For eight or ten years prior to the accident Olson served as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Crouch v. Gilmore Oil Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Counihan v. Lufstufka Bros. & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Goss v. Pacific Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Rosander v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Marsh v. Tilley Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Griffith v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.