Harris v. Ackerman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
1. The general rule is that allegations in a petition must yield to contradictory facts shown in exhibits attached thereto. Equitable Credit &c. Co. v. Murray, 79 Ga. App. 795 (2) (54 S. E. 2d 650); Atlanta Journal Co. v. Doyal, 82 Ga. App. 321, 325 (60 S. E. 2d 802).
2. The name “Ackerman Construction Co.” imports a corporation, nothing to the contrary appearing (Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co., 45 Ga. App. 754, 166 S. E. 34);. and a check which is signed “Ackerman Construction Co. by Oliver P. Ackerman” is prima facie an obligation of Ackerman Construction Company and not the individual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Equitable Credit & Discount Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Atkins v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
- Lawton v. SwihartIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dell v. KugelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Houston v. PollardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Spielberg v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Republic Mortgage Corp. v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Miles v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.