Legal Opinion

United States v. Krasnov

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1952No. Civ. A. 11024PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

This is an action under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, wherein the United States seeks an adjudication that the defendants have been engaged in monopolistic practices and seeks an injunction restraining them from a continuance or revival of illegal practices and activities in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2. The defendants have also been indicted in this district under Criminal Action No. 15754, returned June 2, 1950, charging the same violations as alleged in the complaint in this action.

For many months…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Picquet v. SwanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1828

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EinstossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Crawford v. LydickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1959
  3. Wilensky v. Standard Beryllium CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1964
  4. Frasca v. EubankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API