Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 5, 1973No. M.D.L. No. 105; Civ. A. No. 225-72PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) has filed a complaint in this civil action charging twenty defendants with violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and of the antifraud, proxy and reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder,1 seeking to enjoin the defendants from committing future violations of these provisions. Defendants Robert A. Katz (“Katz”), Bernard J. Kurek (“Kurek”) and Cortes W. Randell (“Randell”) have asserted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Everest Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. American Soc. of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. KrasnovDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. TrobaughDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. General Host Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973