Wilensky v. Standard Beryllium Corporation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFREY, District Judge.
These four cases are brought by four individual purchasers of common stock in the defendant corporation. The sales were allegedly made in Massachusetts by defendant in December 1960 and January 1961. The defendant is organized under the laws of New York, has a principal place of business in New York, and is neither incorporated nor licensed to do business in Massachusetts. Jurisdiction ■of this Court is based on Section 22(a) ■of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v, on Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, and on diversity of citizenship,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dyer v. Eastern Trust and Banking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
- Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G. M. B. HCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.