Legal Opinion
Frasca v. Eubank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1959No. 24999PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The motion of the third-party defendant, Michael Frasea, to dismiss the third-party complaint must be granted. The pertinent facts are as follows: Karen Frasca was walking with her grandfather, Michael Frasca, when she was struck by an automobile driven by Charles Eubank. Karen and her parents filed a complaint against Eubank and he, in turn, impleaded Michael Frasca. The third-party complaint and summons were served by leaving them with Mrs. Louise Frasca, the mother of Karen and daughter-in-law of Michael Frasca, at her home in Levittown, Pa. Michael Frasca has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Thompson v. Trent Maritime CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States v. KrasnovDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ames Nowell v. Iris Calder NowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Davis-Wilson v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
- Levin v. Ruby Trading CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.