Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 21, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-157; Court 11-00436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Chief Judge:

This is an action by United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to recover civil penalties from a customs broker, Mr. Alejandro Santos (“Santos”), for violating Customs’ regulations. Customs’ Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 10, filed pursuant to USCIT R. 55(b), is currently before the court. Because the Clerk has entered default against Santos, Order, May 8, 2012, ECF No. 9, and Customs’ Complaint, ECF No. 3, establishes a right to relief, sufficient facts to support that right, and sufficient facts to support the requested relief, Customs’ motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Bazrowx v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Horizon Products International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. United States v. PuentesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. United States v. Koehler Oberkirch GmbHUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026
  4. United States v. NYWL Enter. Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. United States v. SantosUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API