Legal Opinion
United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 28, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-98; Court 04-00650PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
CARMAN, Judge:
[Plaintiffs motion to strike is denied. Defendant’s partial motion for summary judgment is denied.]
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Motion”) and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendant’s $10,000 Penalty Refund Claim (“Motion to Strike”). Defendant, UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc. (“UPS” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff, the United States (“Plaintiff’ or “Customs”) each filed timely responses and replies to the respective briefs. The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and for the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Florida Tomato Exchange v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.