Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Leto v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2008No. 07AP-1079Published

1DissentFrench, J.

{¶ 13} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion regarding the one-year statute of limitations contained in R.C. 4123.60. Under the circumstances of this case, the plain language of R.C. 4123.60 allows the administrator to make an award only if a decedent “would have been lawfully entitled to have applied for an award at the time of his death” and if a dependent applies for the award “within one year” after the decedent’s death. The fact that the right-to-participate question at issue here remained unresolved during that year does not change the fact that the decedent would have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Scott v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API