Nassaney v. . Culler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
There are three questions posed by the appeal: 1. Was the court justified, in law, in permitting plaintiff to amend his pleading ? 2. Did the amendment to the pleading, as a matter of law, confer upon the defendant an unconditional right to continuance? 3. Did plaintiff’s pleading in its final form state a cause of action?
'The question whether the complaint states a cause of action must be answered in the affirmative. As originally filed, we think the allegations of fact, if supported by the evidence, would have justified a recovery of damages for a breach of contract, or a rescission of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Capps v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Fleming v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Belch v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- McLaughlin v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Boyette Ex Rel. Boyette v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954