Legal Opinion

Nassaney v. . Culler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

There are three questions posed by the appeal: 1. Was the court justified, in law, in permitting plaintiff to amend his pleading ? 2. Did the amendment to the pleading, as a matter of law, confer upon the defendant an unconditional right to continuance? 3. Did plaintiff’s pleading in its final form state a cause of action?

'The question whether the complaint states a cause of action must be answered in the affirmative. As originally filed, we think the allegations of fact, if supported by the evidence, would have justified a recovery of damages for a breach of contract, or a rescission of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Capps v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Fleming v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Belch v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. McLaughlin v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Boyette Ex Rel. Boyette v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API