Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1954No. 234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, C. J.

Unquestionably the trial judge may permit a litigant to amend bis pleadings either before or after verdict and judgment so that they will conform to the evidence offered, provided the amendment does not change substantially the claim or defense. G.S. 1-163; Bank v. Sturgill, 223 N.C. 825, 28 S.E. 2d 511; Perkins v. Langdon, 233 N.C. 240, 63 S.E. 2d 565; McDaniel v. Leggett, 224 N.C. 806, 32 S.E. 2d 602; Waters v. Waters, 125 N.C. 590; Hicks v. Nivens, 210 N.C. 44, 185 S.E. 469.

Independent of the statute, the right to permit amendments to the pleadings is an inherent discretionary power of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Gilchrist v. . KitchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Griffin v. United Services Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MassengillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Moore v. New York Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Crowder v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API