Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Ryder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 187, Calendar No. 36,291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

In an automobile accident plaintiff’s car was destroyed and she received personal injuries. The automobile was insured and the insurer paid plaintiff the loss, and, by writing, constituted plaintiff its trustee to have recovery from defendants along with her damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff filed a declaration, alleging that she brought suit for herself and as trustee. It developed at the trial that, for damages to the automobile, she was trustee for the insurance company. Suit was brought before the passage of Act No. 271, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14010), permitting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michigan Employers Casualty Co. v. DoucetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Grubaugh v. Simon J. Murphy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Heck v. HenneMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Waters Ex Rel. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McPeake v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hermes v. MarkhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kearns v. Michigan Iron & Coke Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hoban v. Equitable & Central Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API