Legal Opinion

Hermes v. Markham

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1951No. File No. 7262PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimson, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the defendant’s motion for leave to serve and file a proposed amended answer. The action is -one for damages growing out of an automobile collision. The complaint sets forth that the defendant, Markham, was the driver of a taxicab owned by the defendant, City Cab Company, and alleges that a collision between defendant’s taxicab, driven by Markham, and the plaintiff’s car driven by himself occurred through the carelessness and negligence of the. defendant, Markham, and that by reason thereof the plaintiff was damaged in the sum of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Bolton v. DonavanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Beauchamp v. Retail Merchants Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Regent Cooperative Equity Exchange v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Harwood v. HarwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. KlevgaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API