Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Maag

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1909No. 6,320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (67,803); James M. Leathers, Judge. Action by Henry Maag against the National Surety Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff and certain others, said company and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

This action, for an amount claimed to be due on account of material and labor furnished, was brought by appellee Maag against George Kessler and the National Surety Company, on certain contracts and bonds executed by Kessler as principal and the surety company as surety in favor of the city of Indianapolis, by which Kessler undertook to make certain street improvements. John and William Wocher, composing the firm John Woeher & Bro., the Consolidated Coal & Lime Company, George Shelby, and Ashman & Ashman, who claimed that certain amounts were due to them on contracts with Kessler and for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Chapin v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Segee v. DownesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Trust & Savings Co. v. NackenhorstIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Butler v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sumner K. Prescott Co. v. Franklin Tool WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Washoe County Bank v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bell & Howell Co. v. SpoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API