Sumner K. Prescott Co. v. Franklin Tool Works
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered November 10, 1920, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover a money judgment and to foreclose a chattel lien, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The primary purpose of this action was to recover a money judgment and to foreclose a chattel lien. After the action had been instituted, upon the motion of the defendants Henry W. Sumner and Albert E. Parker, copartners doing business under the firm name of H. W. Sumner Company, the Union National Bank was made a party, and the issues made between *285the bank and the Sumner company were also determined in the action. The trial resulted in a money judgment and a direction that the lien be foreclosed, and in the dismissal of the cross-complaint filed by the Sumner company against the bank. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Andrews v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Merchants' Insurance Co. of Providence v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Clarkson v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- German Bank v. SchlothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Crystal Recreation, Inc. v. Seattle Ass'n of Credit MenWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Hite Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Hines v. CheshireWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Burns v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.