Legal Opinion

Duplex Electric Co. v. Padua Holdup Alarm Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 95PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Tho appellant contends that, if claim 6 of the patent in suit is to be interpreted broadly enough to eover the device alleged to infringe, then the claim is invalid, in view of the prior art. Use of a single push button operated by foot pressure to set off a burglar alarm was old in the art, as illustrated in patent No. 848,016, to Donnenworth and patent No. 1,093,801 to Phelps; closing multiple circuits by depression of a ba.r is shown in McCarthy, No. 300,098; while tho patent to Edwards, No. 808,147, for bowling alley foul line, discloses the idea of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Electric Protection Co. v. American Bank Protection Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  3. Smith-Lee Co. v. Plympton Paper Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  2. Penmac Corp. v. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. S. R. Leon, Inc. v. Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  4. Aileen Mills Co. v. Ojay Mills, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. Ames Shower Curtain Co. v. Heinz Nathanson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API