Legal Opinion
S. R. Leon, Inc. v. Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant have made cross-motions under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for summary judgment. The complaint alleges an infringement by defendant of United States Design Patent No. 116,032, issued August-8th, 1939, to Harry Jacknick, plaintiff’s assignor, for a perfume bottle. The answer denies validity and infringement.
The parties have stipulated in writing that certain exhibits, including a copy of plaintiff’s patent, the product to which plaintiff’s design is applied, a model of the allegedly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- American Fabrics Co. v. Richmond Lace WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Mallinson v. RyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- John Tuman & Sons, Inc. v. BasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. General Foundry MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Aileen Mills Co. v. Ojay Mills, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Jepco Corp. v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Friedlander v. UnionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.