Legal Opinion
Graphic Technologies, Inc. v. Pitney Bowes Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 12, 1998No. Civil Action 97-2040-GTVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Graphic Technologies, Inc. (Graphic) brings this action claiming that defendants Pitney Bowes Inc. (Pitney Bowes) and Monarch Marking Systems, Inc. (Monarch), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Pitney Bowes, fraudulently or negligently misrepresented facts in a stock purchase agreement. The agreement covered the sale of all stock in Data Documents Systems, Inc. (Data Systems), a wholly owned subsidiary of Monarch and Pitney Bowes. Plaintiff asserts claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- ICE Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Grynberg v. Agri Tech, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Universal Premium Acceptance Corp. v. Oxford Bank & TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Indy Lube Investments, L.L.C. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- FDX Supply Chain Services, Inc. v. North Face, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.