Legal Opinion

Johns v. Ruff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Wells County; N L. Glaspell, J. Action by John G. Johns against Chris. Ruff. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. One desiring to challenge the sufficiency of evidence to support a verdict must either— 1. Request that a verdict be directed in his favor, or 2. Except to the charge of the court submitting questions of fact to the jury, or 3. Move for a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the-evidence.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Wells County; N L. Glaspell, J. Action by John G. Johns against Chris. Ruff. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. One desiring to challenge the sufficiency of evidence to support a verdict must either— 1. Request that a verdict be directed in his favor, or 2. Except to the charge of the court submitting questions of fact to the jury, or 3. Move for a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the-evidence. No other mode of raising the question of the sufficiency of the evidence is provided by law. Henry v. Mayer, 6 N. D. 143, 71 N. W. Rep. 127.…

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The complaint in this action sets forth a cause of action for services rendered the defendant’s daughter by the plaintiff as a physician and surgeon at defendant’s special instance and request. The answer admits the rendering of the services, but denies specially that such services were at defendant’s special instance and request; and further alleges that such services were performed as an assistant to one Dr. Barr, and that said Barr agreed to pay said assistant out of the sum of $40, the agreed sum to be paid him for performing an operation on his infant daughter; and that the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tribune Printing & Binding Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vidger v. NolinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hemstad v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. O'Brien v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Sayer v. Harris Produce Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westerso v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ennis v. Retail Merchants Ass'n Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Carson State Bank v. Grant Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Smith v. KnutsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Estate of KinseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API