Sayer v. Harris Produce Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of- the district court for Chisago county, Crosby, J..
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Appeal from a judgment rendered in accordance with an order of the court directing that the same be entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, notwithstanding a verdict previously returned in the latter’s favor. '
This judgment will have to be reversed. The order therefor was based upon a motion made in the alternative, as' provided in Laws 1895, c. 320, but the provision in that statute requiring the making of a motion at the close of the testimony requesting the trial court to direct. a. verdict for the moving party was not observed. Such a motion is a necessary preliminary,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Skolnick v. GruesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Johns v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Cushman v. Cliff HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.