Legal Opinion

Sayer v. Harris Produce Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 25, 1901No. Nos. 12,643—(13)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of- the district court for Chisago county, Crosby, J..

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Appeal from a judgment rendered in accordance with an order of the court directing that the same be entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, notwithstanding a verdict previously returned in the latter’s favor. '

This judgment will have to be reversed. The order therefor was based upon a motion made in the alternative, as' provided in Laws 1895, c. 320, but the provision in that statute requiring the making of a motion at the close of the testimony requesting the trial court to direct. a. verdict for the moving party was not observed. Such a motion is a necessary preliminary,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skolnick v. GruesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Knight v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Johns v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cushman v. Cliff HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API