Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Spurlin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8426SC617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

We note at the outset that petitioners filed before the Clerk of Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, for a determination of a boundary line. Where the only issue to be tried is the location of a dividing line, it is a processioning proceeding under G.S. 38-1, et seq. See, Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535, 35 S.E. 2d 633 (1945). However, where title to the land is put in issue the clerk has no authority to pass on any question involved. He must transfer the proceeding to the regular session of superior court where it becomes in effect an action to quiet title pursuant to G.S.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Rock v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. McManus v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Marlowe v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Adams Creek Associates v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API