Baxter v. Baxter
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. W. R. Hervey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
On March 9, 1906, one E. M. Baxter by deed conveyed all her property, consisting of certain real estate of the value, of $5,000, to plaintiff herein, the consideration therefor being an agreement on the part of plaintiff to keep, maintain and care for her during her lifetime. Upon the execution of the deed plaintiff entered upon the duties imposed upon him by his agreement. At the date of the transaction E. M. Baxter was indebted to J. A. Baxter in the sum of $669.83, for which sum, in an action instituted on October 17, 1906, a judgment was duly recorded against her. Thereafter, by virtue of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Sidensparker v. SidensparkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
- Harris v. BrinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Harting v. JockersIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gobins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Benson v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bailey v. LeeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sudbrock v. KroenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.