Legal Opinion

Harting v. Jockers

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey county; the Hon. George W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shops

This is a bill in equity, by appellant, to set aside as fraudulent a contract between Jacob Heuster, Sr., and appellee Jockers, by which Joekers received from Heuster $2000, and in consideration thereof agreed, in building his house, to so enlarge it as to furnish a separate room for Heuster, and to support and maintain him during his life.

It appears that Heuster was, in September, 1884, about eighty-one years old, a widower, and without a home. He was possessed of $2000 in money, personal property to the value of $400, a note of $100, and three other promissory notes of $600 each, executed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lukins v. AirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Sidensparker v. SidensparkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  3. Moore v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Annis v. BonarIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hapgood v. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Security Bank v. BawollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Dillman v. NadelhofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Anderson v. FerrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. McKey v. McCoidIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Tcherepnin v. FranzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API