Legal Opinion

Division of Employment Security v. Westerhold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1997No. 71410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Jeffrey A. Westerhold appeals from an order denying his motion to quash a garnishment filed by the Missouri Division of Employment Security (“Division”) on a judgment in favor of Division for unpaid contributions, interest and penalties. On appeal, Westerhold contends that the trial court erred because (1) the judgment was presumed paid under Missouri’s statute of limitations, and (2) Division’s actions constituted the unauthorized practice of law. We affirm.

In 1985, Westerhold, doing business as Dimarco Management Inc., was an “employer” for the purposes of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Reed v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. De Pass v. B. Harris Wool Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Keitel v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Pourney v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bray v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Wade v. Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Velma L. Mitchell, Tanisha L. Winston and Kayla Sanders v. J&M Securities, LLC and Shannon Metzger, Respondents/Cross-Appellants.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API