De Pass v. B. Harris Wool Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. The petition alleges that: defendant is a Missouri corporation; plaintiff is a duly authorized and licensed practitioner before the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States; defendant, through its agent, employed plaintiff to represent defendant for a contingent fee in certain rate reduction cases before the Interstate Commerce Commission; plaintiff performed the services and prays judgment for the amount claimed to be due. The contract, which is referred to in the petition, made a part thereof and attached as an exhibit,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The KensingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Union Trust Co. v. GrosmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Curry v. DahlbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- In re LyonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Naylor Senior Citizens Housing, LP, and John Dilks v. Sides Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Agran v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.