Legal Opinion

Palumbo v. Audette

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The defendant waives his defence as to the third count, so that in this court the question raised is the plaintiff’s right to recover on the first and second counts the unpaid balances on two promissory notes, each made by Belmont Realty Corporation, payable to the plaintiff, and indorsed by the defendant.

The only defence asserted is that certain mortgages on real estate given by Charles Petit and Annette Petit to Belmont Realty Corporation (the maker of the notes in suit) had been pledged by it as collateral for them; that these mortgages had been foreclosed; that the proceeds of the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seronick v. LEVY SCHONFELDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  2. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Wornat Development Corp. v. VakalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Fairhaven Savings Bank v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Framingham Savings Bank v. TurkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API