Legal Opinion
BayBank v. Sullivan
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided May 27, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. RAD. A, Rule 8A expedited appeal by the defendants of the denial of their motion for relief from judgment.
Plaintiff BayBank commenced this action to recover a deficiency after a mortgage, foreclosure. The defendants contended that (Í) a bankruptcy court order had discharged their mortgage debt to BayBank, and (2) BayBank failed to give the written notice of intent to seek a deficiency required by G.Lc. 244, §17B. BayBank filed a Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, which was allowed on May 29, 1996. For whatever reason, judgment was not entered and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Bowers v. Board of Appeals of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Zotal, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Harris v. SannellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. GarabedianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Godfrey v. Woburn Foreign MotorsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Cadle Co. v. RoweMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Dombrowski v. CroninMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- 128 Sales, Inc. v. DemariaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- St. Mary's Credit Union v. MavreticMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.