Legal Opinion

Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2003No. 27,258PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Justice.

{1} On respective motions for rehearing by the parties, the opinion previously filed in this matter is hereby withdrawn and the following substituted in its place. The parties’ motions for rehearing are otherwise denied, as are the requests filed by amici.

{2} Plaintiff-Respondent Frieda Padilla purchased automobile insurance from Defendant-Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Padilla was involved in an automobile accident with a third party. Following a settlement with the third party’s insurance company for the liability limit of $25,000, Padilla…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Cordova v. World Finance Corp. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fiser v. Dell Computer CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API