Legal Opinion

Toporovich Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, No. 8PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by.Rhodes, P. J.,

Claimant refused a referral offer of suitable work for the following reasons: (1) The rate of pay was lower than he had received in his last employment; (2) he felt the possibilities of obtaining. the desired type of work might be lessened if he accepted other employment; (3) the proffered work was only temporary.

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review held that relator was ineligible to receive benefits under section 402 (a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 43 PS §802 (a), because of his refusal to accept the referral. Claimant has appealed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweeney Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bentz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Raiskin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Reed Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Conti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Raffaele v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API